The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Reviews
15
6
previous article
Review: Stories We Tell
next article
Review: Before Midnight

Review: Now You See Me

by Taylor Sinople on June 6, 2013
Now You See Me
Overall Rating
3.0
3.0
Critic Rating
You have rated this

Movies and magic aren’t so different. Whether it’s watching a film or enjoying a magic act, there exists an important ratio of give-and-take between the audience and the magician or filmmaker. The performer or filmmaker takes from the audience a certain suspension of disbelief, and in return produces a worthwhile and compelling experience. If the take is more than the give, you end up with a poor movie, or a cheap trick. Heist-thriller “Now You See Me” is both.

Jessie Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Isla Fisher, and Dave Franco play four entertainers: a successful magician, a mentalist, an escape artist, and a pickpocket. Together, they are invited by a mysterious, unknown party to form the touring magic super-group The Four Horsemen. For their first performance, they magically teleport a randomly selected audience member to a bank vault on the other side of the world – allowing him to take back all the money with him. Millions of euros rain down on the audience. It is, of course, only an illusion – but the money, the robbery, is real. Assigned to investigate the performers’ impossible crime is FBI agent Rhodes (Mark Ruffalo) and Interpol agent Alma Vargas (Melanie Laurent). Together, they interrogate the magicians and begin to unravel a web of illusion-fueled heists that seem to point towards an ulterior motive and a larger target.

Intriguing, right? On paper this was clearly a desirable product, but with the addition of blockbuster action director Louis Leterrier (“The Transporter”, “The Incredible Hulk”, “Clash of the Titans”), the resulting film is an unimpressive exercise of CGI, hollow, arch-typed characters, and dreadful plot twists. It’s a cheap, dime-store trick.

Of a cast featuring both new actors and veterans, the talent power is anything but lacking in this film. With heavy hitters Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman backing up newer kids Jesse Eisenberg and Dave Franco, the performances aren’t all that bad. It’s the connection (or complete lack of) to the characters they are playing that make for a rough experience. At an overly long, near two-hour runtime, it is of vital importance that an audience can easily care about and invest in the characters on screen. With actors that have al proven their ability to portray compelling characters, it is disappointing that “Now You See Me,” offers a screenplay with nothing new to the genre in characterization. Each of the magicians is indistinguishable from one another outside of their painfully thin bit parts. It’s a challenge to even recall a single character’s name.

Surprisingly, the best piece of the puzzle turns out to be the always-amusing Woody Harrelson as he assigns his typical sarcastic, drunken demeanor to a mentalist able to acutely read others and manipulate them. Filling out the plot are a number of “Ocean’s 11”-inspired heist sequences in which events come together in what is meant to be a mysterious and thrilling way. These montages instead read as a checklist from the back of the “how-to” book on the modern heist thriller – traditional orchestral action score, multi-location crosscutting, out of place chase sequences and other excessive splatters of budget. These types of films can be really fun, but this one just isn’t.

What’s missing is the section of the list that can be the least expensive and the most challenging: the vitalizing heart of a captivating performance, or the comforting sheen of an original, worthwhile story. The magic act sequences take implausibility to a new level as the film attempts to suggest literally impossible magic tricks to be plausible in the real world. Sure, not everything needs to be plausible – especially with brainless eye candy set pieces like this – yet, the film doesn’t provide any layer of cinematic magic in which to let that implausibility become genuine entertainment. The trouble is, people are used to seeing “magic” in some sense every time they see a movie. Cinema in itself is nothing but a series of increasingly elaborate magic tricks. To make a successful film about magic, it requires not solely CGI tricks that an audience can dismiss with a wave of “Well, they can do anything with green screens these days” – but a well-crafted narrative that brings the magic of illusion and the magic of cinema together in cooperation by way of Christopher Nolan’s “The Prestige”.

Recent summer action blockbusters have shown that legitimate dramatic merit truly can come from something as excessive as a superhero story. “Now You See Me” is an action-thriller that squanders dramatic potential in exchange for an impressive ensemble cast that serves only to remind you of films you liked more, and a “gotcha” twist that will delight not because of its cleverness, but because it signifies the film will soon be over.

Item Reviewed

Review: Now You See Me

Author

Taylor Sinople

(All Reviews), Crime, Reviews, Thriller
Dave FrancoIsla FisherJessie Eisenberglouis leterriermark ruffalomelanie laurentnow you see meWoody Harrelson
Dave Franco, Isla Fisher, Jessie Eisenberg, louis leterrier, mark ruffalo, melanie laurent, now you see me, Woody Harrelson
About the Author
Taylor Sinople
Taylor Sinople
Taylor is a Chicago-based writer and aspiring film historian. He is the editor here at TFP, and has contributed to a number of international publications such as Cinema Scandinavia, PopMatters, and Room 101 Magazine. He can also be found listening to podcasts, researching topics he has little use for, or running after a city bus.
You might also like
Dave Francomark ruffaloWoody Harrelson
 
Unfinished Business Review

Unfinished Business Review

by Josef Rodriguez on March 15, 2015
Ken Scott’s second collaboration with Vince Vaughn, Unfinished Business, is suitably funny and well-performed, even if it sometimes can’t help but barely feel like an actual movie.
 
The Lego Movie

Review: The Lego Movie

by Taylor Sinople on February 4, 2014
An unexceptional construction worker mini-figure (or “Lego guy”) named Emmet (Chris Pratt) lives day-to-day, decision-to-decision following the instructions that inform everyone in the Lego universe on how to live and behave. He buys his $37 coffee, he goes to work, he builds skyscrapers only to tear them down again, and he’s REALLY happy about it. […]
comments
Leave a reply
  • Tom
    July 6, 2013 at 7:58 am

    Totally agree there Waldo. The 7.5 rating this has from users on iMDb is thoroughly depressing, although I take some solace from rotten tomatoes and the generally negative response from critics. It does leave you wondering tho whether these people watch the same movie.

  • Waldo Gemio
    July 5, 2013 at 11:01 pm

    Enjoyed your review. Couldn’t agree with you more. But the audience (and it was a full house) seemed to be really into it. Which depresses me no end.

  • Dan O.
    June 12, 2013 at 11:40 pm

    Not everybody in this cast gets a chance to shine and show what they do best, but at least they try with material like this. Great review Taylor.

  • Joey
    June 7, 2013 at 8:30 am

    Agree with some of that, but no way this is a 1/5 movie – just look at the imdb score and other critic reviews to see that.

    • Jenx
      July 7, 2013 at 2:29 am

      Imdb score, really?! It may be the go to site for filmographies etc but for well considered movie reviews it is just terrible. Mostly just fanboys and detractors squabbling over how good or terrible a particular movie is and each giving ridiculous scores at each end of the spectrum. There are far better movie reviews to be found on the Internet. Read a few different ones to get a more balanced view and then make your own mind up after watching the film yourself. Personally I couldn’t wait for this movie I be over – no real emotional investment in any of the characters, shocking editing (seems like there were some important bits completely left on the cutting room floor – point in case being Mark Ruffalo walking in on the sleeping Melanie Laurent and this being all cool like this is a regular thing despite having only just met?), the total pointlessness of M. Laurent’s character (other than weak love interest and to provide explanation of 5th Horseman motive at end) as well as a weak ending made this a chore rather than an enjoyable cinema experience. Damn shame as it had potential to be good at least.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.