The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
1
2
previous article
Review: Art and Craft
next article
Review: John Wick

A Fresh Look At: Boogie Nights (1997)

by Marcus Michelen on October 18, 2014
Overall Rating
8.0
THE BOTTOM LINE

Paul Thomas Anderson’s “Boogie Nights” is an entertaining and often tragic film that features some of Anderson’s most memorable characters, despite occasionally falling into cliché.

8.0
Critic Rating
You have rated this

From the opening shot of “Boogie Nights,” Paul Thomas Anderson makes it abundantly clear that he knows exactly what he’s doing. He begins with a 3-minute-long Steadicam shot of a nightclub circa 1977, elegantly sweeping around past hundreds of faces, including the dozen or so members that make up his primary cast. The restless motion begins to halt as he zooms in in slow motion on the face of the young Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg). From these three minutes alone, we know that Eddie—and Paul Thomas Anderson, by extension—is something special. This opening is spectacular and showy; it’s the result of a man studying the Copacabana shot until he understands its minutiae. As with the remainder of “Boogie Nights,” it’s breathtaking and entertaining, yet nearly falls into cliché.

“Boogie Nights” is ostensibly the story of Eddie Adams as he transforms into bona-fide porn-star Dirk Diggler during the golden age of porn. Eddie is taken under the wing of veteran porn director Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds) and his lover/lead actress Maggie “Amber Waves” (Julianne Moore). Dirk instantly becomes one of Jack’s most popular and promising performers due to his good looks, endurance, and mythically large dick. As Dirk becomes more successful, he befriends fellow porn star Reed Rothchild (John C. Reilly), and the two become costars as well as close friends. Dirk’s rise to stardom coincides with the end of The Golden Age of Porn and the rise of video, leading to his inevitable descent into cocaine abuse and obscurity. While the film’s summary reads as typical biopic fare, the charms of “Boogie Nights” come primarily from the film’s colorful—and often tragic—ensemble of characters.

Anderson’s vision of the pornography industry is decidedly unglamorous. Sure, there’s money, cocaine and beautiful men and women, but everyone in “Boogie Nights” wants to be doing something else with their life. Luis Guzmán’s Maurice doesn’t just want to run a nightclub; he wants to be a porn star. Heather Graham’s Rollergirl doesn’t just want to be a porn star; she wants to get her GED. Phillip Seymour Hoffman’s Scotty doesn’t just want to be Dirk’s friend; he wants to be his lover. Don Cheadle’s Buck doesn’t just want to be an ex porn-star; he wants to open his own used stereo store. Jack Horner doesn’t just want to make porn; he wants to tell a story so compelling that it “just sucks them in and when they spurt out that joy juice they just gotta sit in it. They can’t move until they find out how the story ends.”

This list of supporting characters living their own mini-tragedies goes on and on. Despite the fact that the central story can be summarized as “Raging Bull” with pornography instead of boxing, “Boogie Nights” is a true ensemble film. It’s the kind of film where it feels odd to single out any individual performer because everyone is completely natural in their role. One of Anderson’s greatest qualities is his desire to create fully lived-in, unconventional characters. In “Boogie Nights,” he gives each of his characters enough time to their story, and manages to fill the film’s 155-minute runtime without ever bloating the film or letting it drag. The films-within-the-film are straight-faced parodies of 70s-style porn, filled with bad acting and ridiculous plot tropes. With these scenes, “Boogie Nights” manages to alternate between deadpan comedy and subtle tragedy effortlessly. Because of its sense of humor and likable characters, “Boogie Nights” manages to be Anderson’s most audience-friendly film, despite its relatively intimidating runtime.

A key, and often frustrating problem with “Boogie Nights” is the way in which Anderson takes advantage of his film knowledge. There’s a fine line between reference and cliché, and at times, “Boogie Nights” walks that line a bit too closely. The pool-party scene in “Boogie Nights” is effectively a long reference to the opening shot of “I Am Cuba,” without adding much to the iconic scene. The final scene is cribbed directly from “Raging Bull,” albeit with significantly more prosthetic penis. While references are fun to spot, and no great film is without its predecessors, “Boogie Nights” takes from Scorsese a bit too often without adding much new—even the popularity of “I Am Cuba” is mostly due to Scorsese’s involvement with its rerelease in the mid-90s.

Anderson resorts to cliché again for the central climax of the film: the central characters each reach their dramatic low point at exactly the same, and their lowest moments are cut together to appear to coincide. There’s nothing inherently wrong with structuring a film around this kind of climax, but it risks sending the film over the top. Dirk’s low point in particular makes little sense, and is of no clear fault of his own: having run out of money due to his constantly increasing cocaine intake, Dirk resorts to prostitution, and is beaten and robbed by a gang of homophobic thugs after agreeing to jerk off in front of a male client. It seems odd that Dirk’s low point occurs while he is doing precisely what he was doing in his heyday, and has oddly homophobic undertones. There’s something quite off-putting about the fact that Dirk—a professional sex-worker—has his lowest point during his first homosexual encounter shown in the film. Social issues aside, it’s a blatant attempt to portray Dirk as a victim, and it nearly breaks the film’s high-paced stride.

In the end, these are small missteps. Anderson would come to master the trope of intertwining low points in his next film, “Magnolia,” by embracing his brand of over-the-top showmanship, deliberately pushing the film past cliché and into operatic territory. In a way, “Boogie Nights” can be seen as an entertaining, if sometimes predictable, stepping stone to the rest of his career. We get to see him balance comedy and drama in way he hasn’t since attempted, and he produces some of his greatest characters in the process. “Boogie Nights” is also the only film of his so far that is both a character study and an ensemble film, though his upcoming film “Inherent Vice” seems to fit the bill pretty well, based on the source material. It’s a fun ride, and great to watch a modern master come into his own, even if Anderson is a little too eager to show off his cinematic dick.

Continue Reading Issue #25
Language

English

Release

October 10, 1997

Runtime

2 hr. 35 min.

Genre

Drama

MPAA Rating

R

Director

Paul Thomas Anderson

Cast

Mark Wahlberg, Julianne Moore, Burt Reynolds, Don Cheadle, John C. Reilly, William H. Macy, Heather Graham, Luis Guzmán, Philip Seymour Hoffman

(All Features), Features, Issue #25 - Horror Week, Retrospectives
Boogie NightsBurt ReynoldsDon CheadleHeather GrahamJohn C. ReillyJulianne MooreLuis GuzmánMark WahlbergPaul Thomas AndersonPhilip Seymour HoffmanWilliam H. Macy
Boogie Nights, Burt Reynolds, Don Cheadle, Heather Graham, John C. Reilly, Julianne Moore, Luis Guzmán, Mark Wahlberg, Paul Thomas Anderson, Philip Seymour Hoffman, William H. Macy
About the Author
Marcus Michelen
Marcus Michelen
Marcus is a graduate student of mathematics in Philadelphia. He is not related to the tire company of similar name.
You might also like
John C. ReillyJulianne MooreMark WahlbergPaul Thomas Anderson
 

Review: Bears

by Janneke Parrish on September 14, 2014
“Bears” is a fun little film about a family of bears living out bear lives and doing bear things in the Alaskan wilderness. While the film occasionally tries to pretend it has a plot or some story beyond the bears, it has no actual story, instead providing the viewer with an hour of footage of […]
 

Review: Life After Beth

by Josef Rodriguez on August 21, 2014
“Life After Beth” is a funny, if uneven, zom-rom-com that only explores a fraction of its limitless potential, wasting a horribly misused cast in the process.
 

Review: Guardians of the Galaxy

by Williamson Balliet on August 3, 2014
Director James Gunn’s penchant for hyperbole is form fit to the little-known "Guardians of the Galaxy," sneaking in ludicrousness and self-awareness behind layers of masterful production design.
comments
Leave a reply
Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.