The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
1
previous article
A Fresh Look At: Alien (1979)
next article
CIFF 2014: Creep Review

Bonding with Bond: Thunderball (1965)

by Janneke Parrish on October 20, 2014
Overall Rating
4.0
THE BOTTOM LINE

“Thunderball” can be summed up in one word: godawful.

4.0
Critic Rating
You have rated this

We continue our journey through Bond with 1965’s “Thunderball,” and it’s here that we see the first marked drop in quality. To be fair to “Thunderball,” it’s following up “Goldfinger,” a tough demand for any film. However, from the very first scene to the opening musical number to the introduction of Bond on holiday, it is absolutely clear that “Thunderball” will not be able to live up to the standards set by its predecessors. Indeed, as the film drags on, it becomes even more clear that the film won’t even really be able to live up to action film standards at all, and instead be more of a slog than an adventure.

It’s not the plot of “Thunderball” that’s the problem. The plot remains largely true to form – SPECTRE has stolen nuclear missiles from NATO, and it’s up to Bond (played once again by Sean Connery) to recover them before the governments of the world are forced to pay a ransom. Along the way, he meets lovely ladies, kills some less lovely people, and ultimately triumphs over evil. It’s not terribly unique or inspired, but then, neither were the plots to the previous films. The simple, straightforward plot works in the film’s favour, creating tension and clear villains and heroes, both vital in an action film.

The set-up of the actual heist is good as well. While the exact details of the plot are nonsensical, it’s largely forgiven, the focus instead being on the stakes and the mystery of what’s going to happen and how. That said, the heist chooses to show every excruciating detail, from the actual hijacking of the missile-laden plane to the mechanics by which that plane is hidden. It drags down an otherwise interesting and exciting scene with unnecessary and boring detail.

This sums up one of the main problems with the film. Much of the action takes place underwater, giving the impression that filmmakers were so pleased to get access to scuba divers that they just wanted to include as many shots of them as possible. Underwater action scenes are painfully slow, and scenes of Bond or some other random minion swimming – the mask makes it almost impossible to keep track of which diver is which – are sometimes mind-numbingly boring.

To compound this pacing problem, “Thunderball” has some of the most present incidental music of the series thusfar. It is very distinct, and very clear when it’s played. The first time it’s used, it serves its purpose spectacularly, setting an eerie and creepy mood. By the twelfth time it’s used, it’s lost all meaning and serves only to remind the audience of better films they could be watching. Even the villain, Emilio Largo (Adolfo Celi), is largely generic despite his unhealthy interest with scuba divers. He doesn’t seem particularly brilliant or capable, but just average in his villainy.
To counter this, however, there are more interesting and varied characters than in any previous Bond films. Fiona Vulpe (Luciana Paluzzi) represents by far the most interesting female character to date (beyond the always delightful Moneypenny (Lois Maxwell), of course), and even provides excellent commentary on Bond’s “superhero” oeuvre. She sleeps with him as a way to trap and capture him. When he is taken aback by this, she mocks him, asking if he expected sex with him to immediately turn a woman from evil to good. It’s a brilliant line, and the perfect response to what I see as the debacle with Pussy Galore in the previous film. It comments on the ridiculousness of the entire series, lampshading it and showing a glimmer of self-awareness in a series that desperately needs it. It’s brilliant, and I loved it.

Of course, there are two counters to this. The first is that Vulpe dies for her trouble, having had the audacity to be womanly and not just shoot Bond on the spot. The sole interesting character is removed in a completely random gesture. While I can understand the difficulty in keeping the plot simple and needing to quietly excuse something that would make that more difficult, Bond’s reaction – and the film’s lack of reaction more generally – makes everyone seem like a sociopath, or at the very least like they were expecting a highly capable agent to up and die for no reason.

The second counter is a chronic one, though worse in “Thunderball” than ever before. This is Bond’s attitude towards women. In “Goldfinger,” we were treated to what was debatably the rape of Pussy Galore, complete with cheerful music and a horrific deus ex machina of an ending. In “Thunderball,” we are instead treated to the completely pointless sexual harassment and arguable rape of a spa attendant. This is, of course, once again played for laughs, with the attendant’s protestations seeming childish and ridiculous. As always, exploitation and abuse of women in the film is taken as a given and acceptable – if not encouraged – part of Bond’s character, a flaw no different than his tardiness. Once again, I can understand that this is a film from a different era, but I find myself questioning how and why Bond can be considered a hero when this is how he views the world. It raises the greater question of what a hero is at all. Is there room for a hero to do morally reprehensible things, such as rape? Can Bond still be an admirable and laudable hero despite his proclivity towards sexual assault?

In any case, the already dull “Thunderball” is not improved by the addition of Bond’s more obnoxious tendencies. It’s a painful film to watch, especially after the standards set by its predecessors. It’s boring, sometimes looks more like a Caribbean travel film than an action film, and can’t even succeed as a standalone film, let alone as a successor to the likes of “Goldfinger” and “Dr. No.” It’s the sort of film that makes me question why I’m watching all the Bond films at all.

Ah well. At least there was more than two hours in which I could bond with James Bond.

Return to Bonding with Bond: Janneke Parrish Investigates an American Icon 
Language

English

Release

December 21, 1965

Runtime

2 hr. 10 min.

Genre

Action-Adventure, Crime

Director

Terence Young

Cast

Sean Connery, Claudine Augur, Adolfo Celi

(All Features), Bonding with Bond, Features, Issue #25 - Horror Week
Adolfo CeliClaudine Augursean conneryTerence YoungThunderball
Adolfo Celi, Claudine Augur, sean connery, Terence Young, Thunderball
About the Author
Janneke Parrish
Janneke Parrish
Janneke Parrish lives in South Korea where she struggles to order pizzas and consoles herself by watching far too many movies.
You might also like
sean connery
 

Bonding with Bond: Diamonds are Forever (1971)

by Janneke Parrish on November 16, 2014
“Diamonds are Forever” shows that Bond, too, can be forever.
 

Bonding with Bond: You Only Live Twice (1967)

by Janneke Parrish on October 26, 2014
“You Only Live Twice” is a film you can get away with only seeing once.
 

Bonding with Bond: Goldfinger (1964)

by Janneke Parrish on October 12, 2014
“Goldfinger” promises a web of sin, and delivers, though perhaps in more ways than it intended.
 

Bonding with Bond: From Russia With Love (1964)

by Janneke Parrish on October 5, 2014
“From Russia With Love” may not actually be from Russia, but it certainly sends its love.
comments
Leave a reply
  • Rosie
    April 23, 2015 at 9:04 pm

    [” It’s boring, sometimes looks more like a Caribbean travel film than an action film, and can’t even succeed as a standalone film, let alone as a successor to the likes of “Goldfinger” and “Dr. No.” “]

    I disagree. I regard “Thunderball” a major improvement over both “Dr. No”, with its conflicting genre; or the cartoonish and plothole riddled “Goldfinger”.

Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.