The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Reviews
7
0
previous article
A Fresh Look At: Divine Intervention (2002)
next article
New to The Criterion Collection: May 2014

Review: Tim’s Vermeer

by Zack Miller on May 12, 2014
Overall Rating
5.5
THE BOTTOM LINE

An art documentary without much to say about art, "Tim's Vermeer" plays like a glorified episode of “Mythbusters,” albeit one with an initially captivating premise.

5.5
Critic Rating
You have rated this

When it comes to art, there is a fine line between deconstruction and destruction. The experiment at the heart of the documentary “Tim’s Vermeer” – an exploration of how works of art are created – is decidedly the former, but the film loses some intrigue by not dealing with questions of the latter.

Tim Jenison, the subject of the film, is a successful inventor, a specialist in optical technology, and a fan of the works of 1600’s Dutch artist Johannes Vermeer. This appreciation makes perfect sense given that Tim has built a career on manipulating light and color, and Vermeer is revered for incorporating those same elements into his painting with striking skill and precision. Based on controversial theorizing that Vermeer (and other master artists) may have used mechanical means to supplement his abilities, Tim decides to try and prove the plausibility of such claims.

Famed illusionists Penn & Teller narrate and direct this undertaking, respectively. They track Tim’s progress as he attempts to recreate The Music Lesson, one of Vermeer’s more involved pieces, from scratch – not a phrase that Tim takes lightly. Before the painting process can begin, he wants to ensure absolute authenticity in all areas of the experiment, including custom-built furniture and handcrafted glass lenses. It’s here that Teller, a first-time director, exposes his lack of experience behind the camera. Choppy editing, pointless digressions, and montage sequences that drag on start to chip away at the interest that the topic initially garnered.

The real issue with the film, though, is that it tries to be more movie than it has content for. Tim’s obsession with detail entertains for a while – one scene where he cuts his lathe in half because it is too small to shape a harpsichord leg in one piece grabs a laugh for it’s deadpan presentation – but eventually runs out of steam. Rather than mine the wealth of interesting discussion fodder available, the film is padded out with voice-over of Penn essentially answering his own questions about whether Tim’s process (and allegedly Vermeer’s) is “cheating” and what that means for art enthusiasts. It feels a bit like one of the duo’s magic shows, where Penn plays the mouthpiece to keep viewers from thinking about anything too seriously.

One of the major questions that the film asks is whether art can be rendered objectively. After successfully completing his painstaking reproduction, Tim’s response is a resounding yes. By watching, a more complicated answer becomes self-evident: yes it can, but it still takes an artist to make it special.

Continue Reading Issue #2
Language

English

Release

December 6, 2013 (limited)

Runtime

1 hr. 20 min.

Genre

Documentary

Director

Teller

Cast

Tim Jenison, Penn Jillette, Martin Mull, Philip Steadman, David Hockney

(All Reviews), Documentary, Issue #02, Reviews
Art DocumentariesDavid HockneyFine ArtMartin MullPenn JillettePhilip SteadmanTellerTim Jenison
Art Documentaries, David Hockney, Fine Art, Martin Mull, Penn Jillette, Philip Steadman, Teller, Tim Jenison
About the Author
Zack Miller
Zack Miller
Zack is a software developer from Halifax, Nova Scotia moonlighting as a cinephile - until the weekend, when those roles reverse. He can often be found thoughtfully stroking his beard or thoughtfully stroking his cat. Despite remaining in the sitting position almost exclusively, he occasionally makes time to be bent into other shapes during jiu jitsu practice. You can aggresively shout your opinions and objections at him via Twitter or in person (anywhere beer is served).
You might also like
Fine Art
 

Sofia Coppola: Cine-Poet

by Joanna Elena Batsakis on November 2, 2014
While much has yet to be written on Sofia Coppola’s film work academically, on a general critical level film discussion about the writer/director is limited to criticisms of gender and family Hollywood connections, which ultimately distracts the viewer from the original intertextual imagery of Coppola’s cinema. Through this essay “Sofia Coppola: Cine-poet,” I hope to […]
 

Third Generation Abstract Expressionist: Dennis Hopper’s Fusion of Fine Art and Cinema

by Joanna Elena Batsakis on September 14, 2014
Three hung-over, disgruntled men walk out slowly into the bright sunlight from inside a grimy small-town police station. One dressed in leather pants and another in a fringed jacket with a crumpled blue necktie walk to their motorcycles. The other, a young lawyer dressed in a wrinkled, white summer suit, takes a swig from a […]
Comments
Leave a reply
Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

Latest Articles

 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Heathers (1988): A “Wobbly” Kind of Beauty

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.