The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
2
0
previous article
Bonding with Bond: From Russia With Love (1964)
next article
A Fresh Look At: Spoorloos (The Vanishing) (1988)

“Zodiac” and the Work Ethic of David Fincher

by Josef Rodriguez on October 6, 2014

Speculations of the Zodiac killer’s true identity have sent his most ardent followers into a labyrinth of fragmented stories, clues, and uncertainties. Seeing that the true identity of the infamous serial killer was never discovered, it remains one of our nation’s greatest mysteries, one that has inspired films, music, and books for over forty years. Perhaps its most accomplished incarnation came in David Fincher’s 2007 film “Zodiac,” a police procedural starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Robert Downey Jr., and Mark Ruffalo that served as a factual retelling of the events leading up to and resulting from the string of Zodiac murders that took place in San Francisco during the 1960s and 70s. But more importantly, “Zodiac” is a meditation on the art of filmmaking and the dangers of obsession after experiencing a slowly deteriorating career rooted entirely in the search for perfection in an imperfect medium.

“Zodiac” was Fincher’s first project after a five-year hiatus from filmmaking. His last picture, 2002’s “Panic Room,” was shot with the Panavision Panaflex Platinum, a 35mm film camera that he had used to shoot two of his previous films, 1999’s “Fight Club” and 1997’s “The Game.” Fincher recalls the production of “Panic Room” as being an “arduous” process, one that was supposed to work on a smaller scale than the 150 location production of “Fight Club.” Instead, it snowballed into something much bigger than anyone anticipated, resulting in one of Fincher’s biggest shoots to date. The 120 day shooting schedule of “Panic Room” prompted Fincher to take a break from directing in order to reassess his priorities as a filmmaker and return with a clear mind and an even clearer vision.

With his return to the screen, Fincher took advantage of the new technology available to filmmakers. Shooting the film with the Thomson VIPER FilmStream Camera, a digital camera that the director also used on his 2008 film “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button,” Fincher was resurrected, donning a new visual personality. As a result, “Zodiac” represented a massive shift in his career, one that brought him from the realm of cult filmmaker into that of a director of great power both in his ability to tell a story and his ability to shoot one.

Interestingly enough, Fincher was hesitant about directing “Zodiac” after the ferocious success of 1995’s “Se7en,” going so far as to say that he didn’t want to make “another serial-killer movie.” What makes “Zodiac” so interesting, as a result, is how much of the focus is actually on the Zodiac killings. Instead, Fincher turns his camera on those who were involved with the investigation of the Zodiac instead of trying to understand the killer himself. Detective Dave Toschi, who is played by Mark Ruffalo and was apparently the inspiration for Steve McQueen’s portrayal of the titular character in 1968’s “Bullitt,” and San Francisco Chronicle reporter Paul Avery, who dedicated much of his career in the early 1970s to reporting on Zodiac, are among the main focuses of the film, and the attention to detail regarding the character development is really what makes the film worth watching over and over again.

zodiac1

Still, Fincher’s film is based heavily on Robert Graysmith’s book “Zodiac,” which was published in 1986 after more than a decade of tireless research. Graysmith, who was a political cartoonist at the San Francisco Chronicle when the Zodiac murders were first being reported, is played by Gyllenhaal, who is referred to as a “boy scout” during a conversation between Robert Downey Jr.’s Paul Avery and one of his superiors. Graysmith’s job is a perfect description of his character. In the office, Graysmith is never taken quite as seriously as his peers. In the world of arts and entertainment, cartoons are seen as childish and menial exercises to divert the attention of any young mind who will submit to them. But being heavily involved in politics reveals an almost unhealthy obsession with following information and following up on how it affects those who are involved. And while Graysmith is never seen with much regard by many of his co-workers, he takes matters into his own hands and utilizes his relatively unimportant position at the paper as an asset to gain access to information that others would not be able to due to jurisdictional issues and egotistical vendettas.

As a narrative structure, “Zodiac” is split into two parts, those being the scenes before and after the Zodiac’s four year hiatus. The film opens on a bleak, grey San Francisco, a city known for its dreary weather. The night is July 4th, 1969, and two young people, Mike Mageau and Darlene Ferrin, are murdered in Darlene’s car by an unknown assailant. From there, the narrative evolves into a story of obsession, both from the Zodiac and those investigating him. Most of the scenes are shot with a grey and dark blue color scheme to accentuate the glum nature of the setting, save for scenes involving Robert Graysmith, a young and curious party who hopes to crack the case. Whenever he is on-screen, there is slightly more color and vibrance. Graysmith’s enthusiasm about the case has a literal effect on the color scheme of the film. But since it can be argued that the film’s first chapter has no singular perspective, the addition of color in Graysmith’s presence is slight and barely noticeable. However, once the film’s second chapter begins, everything changes.

Dramatic recreations of true-life murders tend to soften up the roughest edges for the sake of marketability. Fincher’s “Zodiac” is the antithesis to those films, displaying violence from the Zodiac’s perspective, which is to say it’s almost fetishized in its brutality. Never daring to turn a blind eye to every gruesome detail, Fincher exposes how desensitized audiences have become by depicting brutality that is rarely seen on the screen. The confrontational tone of the film is maintained until Graysmith becomes the film’s focal point in the final hour. As “Zodiac’s” second chapter begins, prefaced with a title card that reads 4 Years Later, there is an instantly noticeable shift in tone. The colors are brighter, the music is more playful, the dialogue sounds more scripted. As a viewer, it’s jarring to see that “Zodiac” has become the film it spent its first 90 minutes mocking. But it quickly becomes apparent that it’s not the tone that’s changed, it’s the perspective.

zodiac4

Changing the focus from an ensemble piece to a more focused examination of Graysmith’s investigation of the Zodiac killings is reflected in the tone of the film. Graysmith is now the rookie detective that Dave Toschi was two decades ago, or the fresh-faced reporter that Paul Avery was before his alcoholism sent him into a frenzy of missed deadlines and eventual unemployment. What is perhaps most disheartening about this change in tone is that, eventually, the film returns to the hopelessly grey and blue color scheme that it started with, signifying that Graysmith, like his peers, has been defeated by the Zodiac. He may have escaped with his life, but whether or not his sanity is intact remains to be seen.

From the perspective of Fincher, it could be interpreted that Zodiac’s four year hiatus relates to Fincher’s five year hiatus from filmmaking; one that he emerged from with a new zest for directing that was tested, once again, by a lengthy and laborious production schedule. Fincher is a director that is often too ambitious for his own good. Working with new digital technology, the requirement to take a break every time the camera needed a new reel was completely eliminated. The script was so long that, to avoid cutting important scenes from a potentially three-hour film, Fincher had his actors recite their dialogue even faster to make sure everything fit within the film’s 157-minute running time. As a result of all these expectations, some members of the cast and crew, including Robert Downey Jr., revolted against Fincher’s non-stop work ethic. Downey Jr. in particular displayed his rebellion by filling mason jars with urine and leaving them around set.

For all of its detail regarding the who’s, where’s, and why’s of the Zodiac killings, “Zodiac” is as much about a deranged murderer as it is about the plight of the artist. Seeing that much of the film’s content is related to film itself (one of the case’s primary suspects worked as a projectionist in a movie theater; “Dirty Harry” is seen as being based heavily on the Zodiac killings; Dave Toschi’s association with “Bullitt”), it’s not preposterous to think that Fincher’s story of the world’s most elusive serial killer is also a reflection of his career and his own struggles as a film director. It’s obvious that Fincher wasn’t interested in making another serial killer movie, so by adding a subtext in which the film is really just a comment on film, the result is cathartic for Fincher and endlessly entertaining for viewers, who are treated to one of the most detailed, well-made, and distinguished thrillers of the 21st century.

Continue Reading Issue #23
(All Features), Essays, Features, Issue #23
David FincherZodiac
David Fincher, Zodiac
About the Author
Josef Rodriguez
Josef Rodriguez
Josef Rodriguez is a writer, filmmaker, and musician living in New York City. He is often labeled as "that guy who didn't love Boyhood" and he finds himself liking Harmony Korine films more than he likes his own friends. When he's not stressing over turning in reviews on time, Josef can be seen playing guitar, watching "Spring Breakers," or trying to write the next great American movie.
You might also like
David Fincher
 

Double Exposure: Gone Girl

by Jakob Johnson on October 6, 2014
Our "Double Exposure" reviews pit two or more critics against one another on the same film to hash out their differences in opinion. Agree with what we have to say or want to offer your own take? Leave it in the comments below.
 

Trent Reznor/Atticus Ross to Score David Fincher’s “Gone Girl”

by Taylor Sinople on January 21, 2014
Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails announced earlier today that he will reteam with English composer Atticus Ross to score David Fincher’s upcoming thriller “Gone Girl”. Reznor and Ross previously won an Academy Award and Golden Globe for their atmospheric, minimalist music that added intrigue and beauty to Fincher’s “The Social Network” before scoring the […]
Comments
Leave a reply
Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.