The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
3
0
previous article
Review: The Trip to Italy
next article
A Fresh Look At: The Tragedy of Man (Az Ember Tragédiája) (2011)

The Art of “The Hustler” and the Allure of the On-Screen Gambler

by Williamson Balliet on September 1, 2014

For twenty minutes of “The Hustler,” Fast Eddie Felson is who every man wants to be. He swaggers into Ames pool hall cocksure and loose. His sights are set on Minnesota Fats, the country’s most renowned pool player. He says that there is simply no other poolroom where he can walk out with $10,000 after a single night. But it is almost never greed that drives great cinematic gamblers, at least not for money. The loss of stakes is simply a representation of a larger psychological defeat by either men or fate. The amounts themselves allow audiences to “ooh” and “ah” over vast, alienating fortunes, but it is ego and hubris that drives these sorts of protagonists. Felson is tragic in the Aristotelian sense, undone through error of judgment. And like these classic heroes, the loss of his prosperity is simply the beginning.

Beginning his career in the theatre, director Robert Rossen knew how to set a scene. Every aspect of Ames is meticulously arranged; the hall feels more like a stage, populated by an ensemble of onlookers who bear witness to Eddie’s fall and resurgence. It is shot in deep focus, with action on nearly every table, action that comes to a swift end as Felson and Fats begin to square off on the felt. Art Director Alexander Trauner and set decorator Gene Callahan, who won Academy Awards for their efforts, created their own little world inside this room. It is interrupted by sunlight on only one occasion, much to the chagrin of the Eddie’s opponent. Minnesota Fats is only ever seen inside this tiny, bustling community. Outside of this room he would appear like any other man, but inside he is a legend. But Ames is a den of iniquity, where obsession is manufactured and dreams shattered. Men train their entire lives to face one another for unsung and unwritten glory, champions only to themselves and the precious few bystanders with lives unimagined outside this miniscule realm.

Felson loses himself first to the bottle, then to Fats. He abandons his long-time partner in the dead of night only to become involved with a woman as broken as he is. The two wallow in their mutual defeatism until Eddie succumbs to the siren song of Bert Gordon, a demon in a high-priced suit who promises vanity, wealth, and action in exchange for Felson’s spirit. This partnership, of course, ends in tragedy. He eventually returns to the story’s beginning, facing Fats at the same pool hall. It is not really redemption he is seeking, as the damage that has been caused by Bert is irreversible. He wishes to prove himself formidable, undercut the notion that his life is decided for him by powers outside of his control. It is a story as old as Gilgamesh, a hero spurred by tragedy attempting to oppose the unopposable. These sorts of epics resonate on a deeply human and almost intangible level. They attempt to qualify urges to fight against foregone conclusions for no other reason then to prove that our character is derived from the journey, not the destination.

But the romance of Eddie Felson differs from that of the compulsive gambler. The latter heroes fail not through momentary lapses in judgment but through their own inextricable depravity. For Axel Freed in Karel Reisz’s exceptional character study “The Gambler,” monetary loss is as inevitable as drawing his next breathe. He is an English professor not a statistician; there simply is no fun in betting safe. He dashes himself upon the rocks, answering any win with the opportunity for loss. An often-cited psychodynamic theory behind compulsive gamblers postulates that they hope to lose, circuitous punishment for unpunished deeds. This thought is given some credence by his bookie Hips, though quickly dismissed by Freed who seems all too familiar with the notion. Freed embodies two other distinct traits found in the study of compulsive gamblers. His life is lived during the roll of the roulette wheel or toss of the dice. The outcome is largely inconsequential to his happiness. Second, he is prone to delusions of omnipotence. While placing $45,000 worth of bets on college basketball games over the phone he states, “I can’t lose… Why? Because I’m betting on them.” It is a wonderful line, delivered in a moment of heated passion, and one that summarizes his essence with the unification of these two destructive mentalities.

The leads of Robert Altman’s “California Split” operate in a similar fashion, but the film instead focuses on the meaninglessness of victory as opposed to the inevitability of defeat. Upon selling everything they can to enter into a high-stakes poker game in Reno, Bill Denny and Charlie Waters have a streak of luck unmatched in their respective lives. Denny’s response is abject despair. These non-career gamblers thrive in uncertainty. To these men, money is fascinating because of its scarcity. It is a catalyst that, when delivered in overabundance, renders their ilk inert. As Charlie says, gazing over stacks of bills, “It doesn’t mean a fucking thing, does it?”

And yet there still exists a frightening excitement and vicarious thrill to observing these men of chance, addict or professional. They are at the whim of fate, their success decided by the shuffle of a deck or lay of the break. They have slipped the shackles of acquiescence, eschewing the banal traditional dream of domesticity and opting for manic-depressive swings and blanket uncertainty. They embody a romantic escapist ideal of non-conformity and selfishness. Their egotism is strong enough to poison whoever gets close enough to pierce the thin veneer of coolness to expose their larger, more characteristic calamity. But even the wakes of chaos that trails these men of action, Sarah Packard’s melodramatic end in “The Hustler” or the corruption of youth in “The Gambler,” are not enough to provide a counterbalance to their appeal. These men adhere to elusive philosophies and loose moral codes. And yet there remains something endlessly fascinating about the indomitable spirit that is unafraid of losing life, limb, or comfort to battle the odds.

Continue Reading Issue #18
(All Features), Essays, Features, Issue #18
About the Author
Williamson Balliet
Williamson Balliet
Comments
Leave a reply
Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.