The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
3
1
previous article
A Fresh Look At: Spoorloos (The Vanishing) (1988)
next article
A Fresh Look At: Metropolis (1927)

Double Exposure: Gone Girl

by Jakob Johnson on October 6, 2014

Editor’s note: Our “Double Exposure” reviews pit two or more critics against one another on the same film to hash out their differences in opinion. Agree with what we have to say or want to offer your own take? Leave it in the comments below.


The Rundown


Jakob Avatar
Jakob Johnson
Final Rating: 8.0 out of 10
Bottom Line: David Fincher, yet again, proves his ability to transform an average novel into a compelling, well-constructed film with “Gone Girl”, which ranks as a formidable entry among similar grim, sordid tales.

Josef Avatar
Josef Rodriguez
Final Rating: 7.5 out of 10
Bottom Line: “Gone Girl” isn’t Fincher’s best or most mature work, but it’s another entertaining and thought-provoking effort from one of the most versatile and acclaimed directors working today.


Jakob Johnson: I have an admiration for writers who can willingly strip down their work or alter it for the screen, just like how Gillian Flynn has done for this adaptation of her novel. My biggest concern going into this film was that Fincher and Flynn would deliver a 1:1 adaptation, which would have been a sincerely major disappointment. While I enjoyed Flynn’s novel, I find her writing to be average at best—sometimes dipping into unpolished and underdeveloped territory—but the benefit of film is that it’s a visual medium and Fincher has a distinctive visual flair that elevates Flynn’s lurid beach read into something more. Every technical aspect is meticulously assembled to provide a slick, clean, well-oiled film that, for the most part, keeps a consistently unsettling atmosphere that left me teeth gritting and my stomach knotted. The only time the film feels more loosely assembled is the first twenty minutes or so, where the ADR seems a little too obvious and the brilliant score from Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross was a little overwhelming (though this very well could have been the fault of the theater I saw it at). Additionally, some of the dialogue between the early just-dating iterations of Nick and Amy is lifted directly from Flynn’s novel and the delivery is stilted and awkward—too “His Girl Friday” in its unsubtle nature. However, after that shaky first half-hour, the consistency and, subsequently, the tension is ratcheted up and doesn’t waver for the rest of the film. 

Josef Rodriguez: I went into the film having not read the book. The only other Gillian Flynn novel I’ve ever picked up was “Sharp Objects” and I gave up on it after about 40 pages. My fear with this film was that Fincher might be making just another murder-mystery, as he has in the past with “Zodiac,” “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo,” and “Se7en.” Much to my surprise, “Gone Girl” is definitely not a murder-mystery. In fact, it’s not a mystery at all, and much of the entertainment value really comes from the writing and DP Jeff Cronenweth’s uniformly excellent cinematography. That being said, I don’t think this film ever transcends its material. The performances are great, the score is phenomenal, and the subtext about this country’s media culture actually turn the film into a thrilling comedy. But, like Fincher’s best work, it never rises above any of that, only because “Gone Girl” is so much movie. It’s a self-contained piece, and it’s trashy, but it’s trash by one of the great living directors. I think we’re seeing a trend of filmmakers just doing something fun for once (PTA’s “Inherent Vice” comes to mind), and that’s totally okay, but I think it holds “Gone Girl” from greatness, hitting the ceiling at very goodness.

I disagree with your point about the first minute. While the ADR is surprisingly terrible during a couple of scenes, I think the film does an excellent job at giving the viewer nearly everything he or she would need to know. The unreliable narrator, the history of the relationship, the central conflict: it’s all introduced seamlessly in that first half hour. If nothing else, Fincher is a master of structure, and knows how to pace his films beautifully. “Gone Girl” is a particular case in that it’s a little hard to pin down both thematically and in its narrative, but that first half hour is anything but inconsistent. I would say that the film becomes inconsistent while switching gears into the foggily-plotted comedy it eventually becomes. After the “big reveal,” we’re really only halfway through the movie, so setting up the necessary information for what is essentially a different film comes as a challenge to Fincher, who handles it as best as he can.

What were your thoughts on Tyler Perry’s performance, as well as the film’s final scene? I thought both were audaciously brilliant in their own ways, and were probably my favorite aspects of the film.

gone-girl1

Jakob: I’m a little baffled by the reception that Tyler Perry’s performance is getting. While there’s nothing wrong with his performance, it’s nothing more than average and it gets the job done. I feel like people, for whatever reason, were expecting Tyler Perry to show up in drag halfway through the film, talking like he just stepped out of “The Jazz Singer”, which is more than a little unfounded, and, when he didn’t, they began singing high praises. While he does play mostly overtly farcical and over-the-top comedic characters in his own films, Perry’s also shown himself capable of playing it totally straight in some of his Madea films, as well as a small, straight-foward role in the 2009 J.J. Abrams’ “Star Trek” and some performances on stage. It’s not a role tailor-made for Perry and I’m sure any actor picked by Fincher and co. could have done just as fine a job.

Josef: I think there was definitely a reason why Fincher chose him, and it came through in the performance. Perry brought a level of charm to the performance that was absent in nearly every other aspect of the film, and I think he was the character that glued together the second half. He was low-key and funny and charming, something that no one else was. If there wasn’t that intermediary character, the film could have easily gone off the rails. I’ve always liked Perry as a performer, just never as a writer or director, and I think that, under Fincher’s watchful eye, he turns in the best performance of his career.

Jakob: As far as the final scene was concerned, I was positively floored. The entire last quarter of the film had me squirming in my seat and the last few scenes teased me with some sort of cathartic release, but didn’t give in. I’ve been hearing a lot of complaints about the ending being unsatisfying, but I’m finding this is more due to prior expectations or a desire for more conventional fiction. One aspect I really enjoyed from Rosamund Pike’s performance in this film was her ability to effectively emote with her eyes (which seems like a given, but I’m finding more and more that it’s harder to notice instances of actors and actresses successfully doing this unless it’s really, really good). There are a handful of small moments in the last 20 or so odd minutes of the film where a glance from Pike would make me feel sick to my stomach in a way that brings to mind the effects of a harshly animalistic fear. And in the final shot of the film, with the mirroring of the first shot, all we’re given (aside from the narration) is a look from Pike, who elicits an entirely different reaction from us viewers than the first time we saw her gaze on-camera. Truly remarkable.

Josef: I was thinking that, as well. I do believe it’s an identical shot but, given the context, the reaction is completely different. Reminds me of that experiment where the same exact facial expression was shown with three different images, and the test subjects thought the face being shown was different each time. I thought the ending’s refusal to give the audience a proper conclusion was one of the best things about the entire movie, only because the genre often calls for something a little neater. Fincher did something similar with “Zodiac,” but I think the extreme vagueness of “Gone Girl” was actually a little bit stronger.


Think Jakob and Josef made some good points? Did you read the novel “Gone Girl” and have some thoughts on the film adaptation? Leave a comment below. 

Continue Reading Issue #23
Language

English

Release

October 3, 2014

Runtime

2 hr. 29 min.

Genre

Drama, Thriller, Mystery

MPAA Rating

R

Director

David Fincher

Cast

Ben Affleck, Rosamund Pike, Neil Patrick Harris, Tyler Perry, Carrie Coon, Kim Dickens, Patrick Fugit, David Clennon, Lisa Banes, Missi Pyle, Lola Kirke, Boyd Holbrook, Emily Ratajkowski, Casey Wilson, Sela Ward

(All Features), (All Reviews), Double Exposures, Drama, Features, Issue #23, Reviews, Thriller
ben affleckBoyd HolbrookCarrie CoonCasey WilsonDavid ClennonDavid FincherEmily RatajkowskiGone GirlKim DickensLisa BanesLola KirkeMissi PyleNeil Patrick HarrisPatrick FugitRosamund PikeSela WardTyler Perry
ben affleck, Boyd Holbrook, Carrie Coon, Casey Wilson, David Clennon, David Fincher, Emily Ratajkowski, Gone Girl, Kim Dickens, Lisa Banes, Lola Kirke, Missi Pyle, Neil Patrick Harris, Patrick Fugit, Rosamund Pike, Sela Ward, Tyler Perry
About the Author
Jakob Johnson
Jakob Johnson
Jakob is a full-time student, full-time aspiring filmmaker, and part-time contributing member of society currently residing in the barren wasteland known as "Central Pennsylvania." On most days, you can find him hunched over a laptop—surrounded by a horde of cats—attempting to have a voice in the cinematic world.
You might also like
ben affleckBoyd HolbrookDavid FincherGone Girl
 
Dazed and Confused (1993)

A Fresh Look At: Dazed and Confused (1993)

by Taylor Sinople on July 13, 2014
In 1991, Richard Linklater reignited the indie scene with his wandering, Austin-set drama “Slacker,” which used arbitrary run-ins to pass the narrative baton between on-screen characters connected only by coincidence. “Slacker” was a niche hit, and has remained so to this day, but Linklater’s very next film, 1993’s “Dazed and Confused,” broke him into the mainstream. […]
 
To The Wonder

Review: To The Wonder

by Taylor Sinople on April 7, 2013
In Terrence Malick’s latest philosophical jaunt in cinema, To the Wonder, Neil (Ben Affleck) and Marina (French actress Olga Kurylenko) are deeply impassioned lovers that move to suburban Oklahoma, USA only to struggle with a suddenly deteriorating relationship in this new locale. There, Neil reconnects with his childhood friend and crush Jane (Rachel McAdams), and […]
comments
Leave a reply
Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.