The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
0
previous article
Bonding with Bond: The Man with the Golden Gun (1974)
next article
A Fresh Look At: Black and White in Color (1976)

Bonding with Bond: The Spy Who Loved Me (1977)

by Janneke Parrish on December 8, 2014
Overall Rating
8.0
THE BOTTOM LINE

“The Spy Who Loved Me” isn’t one you’ll fall in love with, but it’s at least worth a casual acquaintance.

8.0
Critic Rating
You have rated this

It’s interesting that, even as I get further and further into the Bond franchise, the films still don’t necessarily all look the same. “The Spy Who Loved Me,” for instance, represents another foray into the genre of romantic comedy coupled with action, though it is a better example of it than “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service.” I appreciate that the film makers were willing to mix genres a bit and try new elements. It keeps the films unique, even if some aren’t terribly memorable.

“The Spy Who Loved Me” is a romantic comedy in addition to its action tropes. It follows Bond (played once again by Roger Moore) as he investigates the disappearance of a British nuclear submarine alongside his Russian counterpart, Anya Amasova (Barbara Bach). The two discover a plot by Karl Stromberg (Curd Jürgens) to destroy the world and start a new life under the sea.

The plot is not necessarily the high point of the film. Stromberg is a bit ridiculous, and while his plan isn’t the worst plan ever seen in a Bond film, it would certainly fit in with other terrible SPECTRE plans. Indeed, Stromberg himself isn’t even a particularly memorable villain. There have been other villains with an unhealthy love of fish, and other villains with interesting lairs. Stromberg is outshone by his counterparts in “Thunderball” and “You Only Live Twice.” Much more fun is Stromberg’s henchman, Jaws (Richard Kiel), and the element of the thoroughly ridiculous he brings. Jaws is not a character that can be taken seriously – the fact that he is more reminiscent of a particularly sparkly Dracula rather than an action villain – but the action and fight scenes involving him are entertaining enough that he can be seen as a highlight of the film. Indeed, the fact that he continuously escapes whatever doom Bond throws at him is a testament to how much fun Jaws actually is. It’s my hope that I get to see him again.

Bach, too, does a fine job as Amasova. While hers isn’t the best performance from a leading lady, she does have excellent chemistry with Moore, and the two of them are one of the more convincing couples thusfar. The fact that Amasova is a competent spy in her own right, too, is yet another refreshing change of pace. The franchise, for all its previous faults, is progressing in its views, even if many of the underlying biases remain.

Really, there is very little to criticise about “The Spy Who Loved Me.” Its genre shift adds something new and interesting to the franchise, its story is solid, albeit derivative, and its villains are exciting. It’s competently made and a testament to the filmmakers’ abilities. That said, there’s also very little to make it truly stand out as an excellent film, or even an excellent Bond film. It’s not bad, but there’s nothing that really makes it stand out. It is simply a competently made action film with liberal dashes of romance and a cast and crew that know exactly what to do.

On the whole, then, “The Spy Who Loved Me” is good and worth a watch, though it isn’t necessarily anything spectacular. However, it’s a fine addition to the Bond franchise, and most definitely a good example of how to effectively blend genres to bring something new to a series.

Return to Bonding with Bond: Janneke Parrish Investigates an American Icon 
Language

English

Release

July 20, 1977

Runtime

2 hr. 5 min.

Genre

Action Adventure, Crime

Director

Lewis Gilbert

Cast

Roger Moore, Barbara Bach, Curd Jürgens

(All Features), Bonding with Bond, Features, Issue #31
Barbara BachCurd JürgensLewis GilbertRoger Moorethe spy who loved me
Barbara Bach, Curd Jürgens, Lewis Gilbert, Roger Moore, the spy who loved me
About the Author
Janneke Parrish
Janneke Parrish lives in South Korea where she struggles to order pizzas and consoles herself by watching far too many movies.
You might also like
Lewis GilbertRoger Moore
 

Bonding with Bond: Moonraker (1979)

by Janneke Parrish on December 14, 2014
"Moonraker" may dream of the stars, but it first needs to find its feet.
 

Bonding with Bond: You Only Live Twice (1967)

by Janneke Parrish on October 26, 2014
“You Only Live Twice” is a film you can get away with only seeing once.
Comments
Leave a reply

Leave a Response
Cancel reply

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.