The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
The Focus Pull Film Journal The Focus Pull Film Journal
  • Full Issues 
  • Reviews 
  • Features 
  • OUR TEAM
  • Info.
    • OUR TEAM
  • Content
    • Full Issues 
      • Issue #01
      • Issue #02
      • Issue #03
      • Issue #04
      • Issue #05
      • Issue #06
      • Issue #07
      • Issue #08
      • Issue #09
      • Issue #10
      • Issue #11
      • Issue #12
      • Issue #13
      • Issue #14
      • Issue #15
      • Issue #16
      • Issue #17
      • Issue #18
      • Issue #19
      • Issue #20
      • Issue #21
      • Issue #22
      • Issue #23
      • Issue #24
      • Issue #25 - Horror Week
      • Issue #26
      • Issue #27
      • Issue #28
      • Issue #29
      • Issue #30
      • Issue #31
      • Issue #32
      • Issue #33
      • Issue #34
      • Issue #35
      • Issue #36
      • Issue #37
      • Issue #38
      • Issue #39
      • Issue #40
    • Reviews 
      • (All Reviews)
      • Action Adventure
      • Animation
      • Biography/History
      • Comedy
      • Crime
      • Documentary
      • Drama
      • Foreign
      • Horror
      • Romance
      • Sci-Fi
      • Thriller
    • Features 
      • (All Features)
      • Bonding with Bond
      • Double Exposures
      • Essays
      • Event Coverage
      • Lists
      • New to Netflix
      • News
      • Retrospectives
    • OUR TEAM
REGISTER
@
LOGIN
Features
0
previous article
Best of 2014: Films
next article
Best of 2014: Male Performances

Bonding with Bond: For Your Eyes Only (1981)

by Janneke Parrish on December 28, 2014
Overall Rating
4.0
THE BOTTOM LINE

"For Your Eyes Only" is perhaps best left for the filmmakers’ eyes only.

4.0
Critic Rating
You have rated this

In my last Bond review, I talked a bit about how the franchise seemed to be sliding into mediocrity and resorting to copying itself in order to try and recreate what made previous films so memorable. For Your Eyes Only drifts away from copying, instead trying a new plot and a new set of characters. It’s decidedly more memorable than Moonraker, though perhaps only a little bit better.

For Your Eyes Only follows Bond (played once again by Roger Moore) as he investigates a missing British spy boat. However, the KGB is also interested in this boat as it contains missile codes for the British navy’s nuclear missiles. They hire a Greek businessman with underworld connections named Aris Kristatos (Julian Glover) to retrieve the device and give it to the KGB all while Bond attempts to do the same.

This plot summary is fairly straightforward. It would suggest a more classic race-for-the-macguffin format that can be full of tension and suspense. The trouble with For Your Eyes Only is that the plot is decidedly more convoluted, oftentimes unnecessarily so. Characters flit in and out of existence so quickly that they’re barely remembered by the end of the film, and whatever role they played is so meaningless that it might as well never have happened at all. The Countess Lisl von Schlaf (Cassandra Harris), for instance, plays such a minor role that her only purpose for existing at all seems to be to sleep with Bond and make him look more intelligent with her death.

As a better example, there is a side plot, which tries to be intertwined with the main plot but never gets the momentum to do so. In this side plot, the love interest of the film, Melina Havelock (Carole Bouquet), is attempting to avenge her parents’ death by killing everyone responsible for their deaths. This could be an interesting story, and perhaps a fine film on its own. Instead, it appears on occasion when Bond needs a deus ex machina to rescue him from whatever problem he has only to then take backseat to Bond’s activities. It serves very little purpose, except perhaps to add a little bit of character to Melina. While character building is good, this character goes right out the window once she sleeps with Bond for no discernible reason.

The introduction of the film is also baffling, and might be analogous for the film as a whole. It opens with a character who strongly resembles Blofeld commandeering a helicopter carrying James Bond and trying to kill him. Bond in turn commandeers the helicopter and uses it to pick up the Blofeld look-alike and drop him down a chimney, killing him. What this has to do with the actual plot or who the Blofeld impersonator was is never explained. It’s a random scene that adds nothing to story, and indeed, detracts from the cohesion of the film by existing at all.

While it’s clear that the filmmakers were trying to get back to what made Bond great by following a more traditional story, the attempts to make it complex fail utterly. Instead of the tight, tense action of a film like Goldfinger, the audience is instead treated to a film that slogs along, too burdened by its own obligations to make any sense or to hold the audience’s interest. Even the complete lack of chemistry between Moore and Bouquet highlights and solidifies what makes this film a failure – the elements are there, but are so poorly executed, that they might almost be better off not having existed in the first place.

On the whole, For Your Eyes Only is a bit of a mess. It’s by no means the worst of the franchise thusfar, but it’s also a far cry from a paragon of its genre. It tries to do too much, and in trying to do so, does very little. If Moonraker was the first clear sign of mediocrity, then For Your Eyes Only is the sign that something desperately needs to be done if the franchise is to thrive and continue.

Return to Bonding with Bond: Janneke Parrish Investigates an American Icon 
Language

English

Release

June 24, 1981

Runtime

2 hr. 7 min.

Genre

Action, Adventure, Crime

Director

John Glen

Cast

Roger Moore, Carole Bouquet, Julian Glover

(All Features), Bonding with Bond, Features
Carole BouquetJohn GlenJulian GloverRoger Moore
Carole Bouquet, John Glen, Julian Glover, Roger Moore
About the Author
Janneke Parrish
Janneke Parrish
Janneke Parrish lives in South Korea where she struggles to order pizzas and consoles herself by watching far too many movies.
You might also like
John GlenRoger Moore
 
licence to kill

Bonding with Bond: Licence to Kill (1989)

by Janneke Parrish on March 8, 2015
Licence to Kill should have had its licence revoked.
 
a view to kill 1985

Bonding with Bond: A View to Kill (1985)

by Janneke Parrish on February 15, 2015
A View to Kill gives us our last unfortunate view of Roger Moore.
Comments
Leave a reply
Add Comment Register



Leave a Response
Cancel reply

The Focus Pull in your inbox!

Subscribe to this list, and we'll send you each week's new issue directly to your inbox. One email a week, packed with essential film writing!

Latest Reviews

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Form and Function in Alex Ross Perry’s “Queen of Earth&...
 
Digging for Fire and Unexpected: Husband and Wife Process Parenthoo...
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review

Latest Features

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
Taylor Sinople Picks: The 16 Best Films of 2016
 
Taylor Sinople’s Top 10 Films of 2015: “The Duke of Bur...
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival

Our Partners

Advertisement

FESTIVAL COVERAGE

View All
 
8 Films to See at the 51st Chicago International Film Festival
 
Every Thing Will Be Fine 3D Review
 
Berlinale 2015: Eisenstein in Guanajuato
 
Berlinale 2015: Sworn Virgin
 
Berlinale 2015: Under Electric Clouds

LISTS

View All
 
Taylor Sinople Picks – The 17 Best Films of 2017
 
SNL40: A Look Back at 40 Years of SNL in Film
 
Six Must-See British Films Opening in 2015
 
Oscars 2015: Ranking the Best Picture Nominees
 
Our 26 Most Anticipated Films of 2015
Tweets by @thefocuspull
  • "Popcorn - check. Soda - check...I have a date with Netflix on Friday night." - Sherry
  • "[…] nails it.” I disagree, and frankly wonder what movies John is talking about. The original G..." - Dear Godzilla Fans: Please Stop Defending that ...
  • "[…] www.thefocuspull.com […]" - Annie Hall
  • "[…] more vibrant monologue or confrontation, like the dinner scene that comes at just the right time ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
  • "[…] of the year is also the stuff of a best picture winner. With Michael Keaton, hot off praise from ..." - Taylor Sinople's Top 10 Films of 2015
TRENDING ON TFP
   
Try a different filter
© 2014 THE FOCUS PULL FILM JOURNAL
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.